<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Glen Murray could be a Shark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark</link>
	<description>Two dudes blogging and podcasting about the San Jose Sharks, straight from sunny California.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:45:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cantstopthegrier</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3344</link>
		<dc:creator>cantstopthegrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3344</guid>
		<description>Huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Murray</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3343</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3343</guid>
		<description>go into the Sharks with a big Joe Thornton this team in western Conference you are a New Guy in San Jose Sharks this team are going to be a Champ on San Jose Sharks by corey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go into the Sharks with a big Joe Thornton this team in western Conference you are a New Guy in San Jose Sharks this team are going to be a Champ on San Jose Sharks by corey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Murray</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3342</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3342</guid>
		<description>go into the Sharks with a big Joe Thorntpn this team in western Conference you are a New Guy in San Jose Sharks this team are going to be a Champ on San Jose Sharks by corey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go into the Sharks with a big Joe Thorntpn this team in western Conference you are a New Guy in San Jose Sharks this team are going to be a Champ on San Jose Sharks by corey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cantstopthegrier</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3341</link>
		<dc:creator>cantstopthegrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3341</guid>
		<description>Some great comments on this post, where it seems people aren&#039;t sold on adding Glen Murray, or where he would play if he was on the team.  We will definitely talk about this on Wednesday&#039;s podcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great comments on this post, where it seems people aren&#8217;t sold on adding Glen Murray, or where he would play if he was on the team.  We will definitely talk about this on Wednesday&#8217;s podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3340</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3340</guid>
		<description>I completly agree that Cheech should stay on the same line as Jumbo Joe, but if he was to get moved, then a line with marleau doesnt work - patty is just too quick for him, and their games dont suit. I dont think signing murray is necessary or a good move, and i agree with all the above comments in terms of age and cap space. If he was to join the team, then i think it would have to be on a line of cheech and thornton, leaving michalek to play with pavs and marleau - which i think could work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completly agree that Cheech should stay on the same line as Jumbo Joe, but if he was to get moved, then a line with marleau doesnt work &#8211; patty is just too quick for him, and their games dont suit. I dont think signing murray is necessary or a good move, and i agree with all the above comments in terms of age and cap space. If he was to join the team, then i think it would have to be on a line of cheech and thornton, leaving michalek to play with pavs and marleau &#8211; which i think could work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3339</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3339</guid>
		<description>I like Glen Murray as much as the next guy, but as I said on the podcast, it jams up the line combos, unless somebody can switch to the left side. Also, I just can&#039;t see the Sharks getting him as cheap as $1M.  The Kings are about $50M under the floor right now, they should bring him back for a coupla mil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Glen Murray as much as the next guy, but as I said on the podcast, it jams up the line combos, unless somebody can switch to the left side. Also, I just can&#8217;t see the Sharks getting him as cheap as $1M.  The Kings are about $50M under the floor right now, they should bring him back for a coupla mil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>I agree with Ivan. Seperating Joe and Cheech doesn&#039;t sit right with me. I see it as Murray or Sets. The Giants right now are a good example of why you go with Setoguchi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ivan. Seperating Joe and Cheech doesn&#8217;t sit right with me. I see it as Murray or Sets. The Giants right now are a good example of why you go with Setoguchi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3337</guid>
		<description>$1M seems like a lot, especially if he&#039;s getting $1.3 from his buyout.  But I could see several teams waiting until they have injury issues to bring in someone like Glen.

As for the &quot;best 2nd line in hockey&quot;, that&#039;d be a stretch.  You might get some arguments out of the two Cup-finalist teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$1M seems like a lot, especially if he&#8217;s getting $1.3 from his buyout.  But I could see several teams waiting until they have injury issues to bring in someone like Glen.</p>
<p>As for the &#8220;best 2nd line in hockey&#8221;, that&#8217;d be a stretch.  You might get some arguments out of the two Cup-finalist teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3336</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3336</guid>
		<description>The only Shark signing I want to see at this point is Clowe.  I am still afraid of the other moves that might have to fit Clowe in at this point.  I don&#039;t watch alot of Bruins Hockey and although his numbers were great when Joe was there It still has to be a gamble in my mind and being so close to the cap I just don&#039;t know if its one we could afford unless Clowe by some horrific twist of fate is no longer an option and even then I&#039;m at a loss for what then the Sharks would need to do.  Going to be interesting to watch though in what is definatly a boring summer at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only Shark signing I want to see at this point is Clowe.  I am still afraid of the other moves that might have to fit Clowe in at this point.  I don&#8217;t watch alot of Bruins Hockey and although his numbers were great when Joe was there It still has to be a gamble in my mind and being so close to the cap I just don&#8217;t know if its one we could afford unless Clowe by some horrific twist of fate is no longer an option and even then I&#8217;m at a loss for what then the Sharks would need to do.  Going to be interesting to watch though in what is definatly a boring summer at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/2008/07/25/why-glen-murray-could-be-a-shark/#comment-3335</guid>
		<description>Guys -
I&#039;m not sure this makes sense. I simply cannot see Cheechoo on any other line than on Jumbo&#039;s line. I know he was injured and all, but it wasn&#039;t until RW stopped shuffling Cheechoo around and put him back with Joe (plus arrival of Soup helped) that Cheech started scoring regularly.

Plus, with all veterans we already have, I don&#039;t see us needing to pick up another one, especially if we want to continue to develop our young guys. Murray would take a spot away from another young player to get NHL experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys -<br />
I&#8217;m not sure this makes sense. I simply cannot see Cheechoo on any other line than on Jumbo&#8217;s line. I know he was injured and all, but it wasn&#8217;t until RW stopped shuffling Cheechoo around and put him back with Joe (plus arrival of Soup helped) that Cheech started scoring regularly.</p>
<p>Plus, with all veterans we already have, I don&#8217;t see us needing to pick up another one, especially if we want to continue to develop our young guys. Murray would take a spot away from another young player to get NHL experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

