<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow.  Just Wow.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/01/18/wow-just-wow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/01/18/wow-just-wow/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wow-just-wow</link>
	<description>Two dudes blogging and podcasting about the San Jose Sharks, straight from sunny California.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcyde</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/01/18/wow-just-wow/#comment-3717</link>
		<dc:creator>bcyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=288#comment-3717</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t believe grier hasn&#039;t already posted this, but check the front page of the sharks site. Claude has been called up from Worcester.

Also, it seems Torrey Mitchell has re-injured his leg during his reconditioning stint in his second game back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t believe grier hasn&#8217;t already posted this, but check the front page of the sharks site. Claude has been called up from Worcester.</p>
<p>Also, it seems Torrey Mitchell has re-injured his leg during his reconditioning stint in his second game back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/01/18/wow-just-wow/#comment-3716</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=288#comment-3716</guid>
		<description>Thanks bcyde, now fixed.  I can&#039;t seem to find enough video to say it&#039;s offsides for sure, and that screen cap is a pretty good argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks bcyde, now fixed.  I can&#8217;t seem to find enough video to say it&#8217;s offsides for sure, and that screen cap is a pretty good argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcyde</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/01/18/wow-just-wow/#comment-3715</link>
		<dc:creator>bcyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=288#comment-3715</guid>
		<description>Oh also, it seems like a lot of people not voting for the sharks are taking issue with Marleau being offsides on his goal.

This was also posted on hfboards:
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7553/clearlyonsidesxr0.jpg .  Looks like just a really good play to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh also, it seems like a lot of people not voting for the sharks are taking issue with Marleau being offsides on his goal.</p>
<p>This was also posted on hfboards:<br />
<a href="http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7553/clearlyonsidesxr0.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7553/clearlyonsidesxr0.jpg</a> .  Looks like just a really good play to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcyde</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/01/18/wow-just-wow/#comment-3714</link>
		<dc:creator>bcyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=288#comment-3714</guid>
		<description>Small correction, final score was 6-5, not 6-4.  But yes it was a very nice game and I found myself yelling at the TV in excitement quite a few times.  A few random thoughts in  no particular order:

I&#039;m one of the main haters of Frankenstein, but I must say he did a decent job in the absence of Blake and Lukowich.  I read on hfboards that &quot;Semenov last night played for over 18 min and had more time on the PK than any other Dman -- -over 2 1/2 mins.&quot;  If that&#039;s true I think I&#039;ll cut him a little bit more slack (at least until he gets another goal knocked in off of him).

Goc had a good game, just wish he would be able to get on the score sheet more so that his contributions could be more tangible.

Really glad, Ehrhoff got a goal, hopefully he can get some of his game and confidence back from the beginning of the year.

I also read that Torrey Mitchell scored in his first AHL game (but missed in the shootout).  I am really excited if we can have a fully healthy lineup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small correction, final score was 6-5, not 6-4.  But yes it was a very nice game and I found myself yelling at the TV in excitement quite a few times.  A few random thoughts in  no particular order:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m one of the main haters of Frankenstein, but I must say he did a decent job in the absence of Blake and Lukowich.  I read on hfboards that &#8220;Semenov last night played for over 18 min and had more time on the PK than any other Dman &#8212; -over 2 1/2 mins.&#8221;  If that&#8217;s true I think I&#8217;ll cut him a little bit more slack (at least until he gets another goal knocked in off of him).</p>
<p>Goc had a good game, just wish he would be able to get on the score sheet more so that his contributions could be more tangible.</p>
<p>Really glad, Ehrhoff got a goal, hopefully he can get some of his game and confidence back from the beginning of the year.</p>
<p>I also read that Torrey Mitchell scored in his first AHL game (but missed in the shootout).  I am really excited if we can have a fully healthy lineup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

