<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: July 1 &#8211; Kent Huskins Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=july-1-kent-huskins-day</link>
	<description>Two dudes blogging and podcasting about the San Jose Sharks, straight from sunny California.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilducks</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/#comment-4331</link>
		<dc:creator>evilducks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=381#comment-4331</guid>
		<description>Clowe signs for 4 years for 3.5 a year...  I think we&#039;re officially out of cap space at this point.  I have no idea how he&#039;s going to pull this off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clowe signs for 4 years for 3.5 a year&#8230;  I think we&#8217;re officially out of cap space at this point.  I have no idea how he&#8217;s going to pull this off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/#comment-4330</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=381#comment-4330</guid>
		<description>I think the PK is in the able hands of Marleau, Pavelski, and Mitchell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the PK is in the able hands of Marleau, Pavelski, and Mitchell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacob</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/#comment-4329</link>
		<dc:creator>jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=381#comment-4329</guid>
		<description>Other than Moen, are there people DW should be looking at that would be our new &quot;captain of the pk&quot; now that grier is gone. Is there any way to improve at this position or should we expect Mitchell and McGinn to head our PK. Stephane Veilleux might be a possibility (McClellen coached him in Houston) but that doesn&#039;t like much of an upgrade to Moen (though he might be cheaper).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than Moen, are there people DW should be looking at that would be our new &#8220;captain of the pk&#8221; now that grier is gone. Is there any way to improve at this position or should we expect Mitchell and McGinn to head our PK. Stephane Veilleux might be a possibility (McClellen coached him in Houston) but that doesn&#8217;t like much of an upgrade to Moen (though he might be cheaper).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cantstopthegrier</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/#comment-4328</link>
		<dc:creator>cantstopthegrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=381#comment-4328</guid>
		<description>Tom: Beauchemin would be a great addition and not out of the realm of possibility...although I keep hearing he could be replacing Ohlund in Vancouver. He would be a great #2 guy who plays the kill and can go toe to toe with most anyone. I&#039;m guessing he gets $18-20M over 5 years, a little less than Komisarek and a little more than Spacek got from Montreal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom: Beauchemin would be a great addition and not out of the realm of possibility&#8230;although I keep hearing he could be replacing Ohlund in Vancouver. He would be a great #2 guy who plays the kill and can go toe to toe with most anyone. I&#8217;m guessing he gets $18-20M over 5 years, a little less than Komisarek and a little more than Spacek got from Montreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/#comment-4327</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=381#comment-4327</guid>
		<description>I agree that DW still has tricks up his sleeve... I kinda think everything is coming down to Gustavsson making his choice. I think is he comes here they MIGHT consider trading Nabby...

But I agree that Heatly is NOT COMING TO SJ...I don&#039;t think DW wants him, kinda seems like what we already have, all skill not much grit.

I still think Hartnell would be a great addition.

Any chances we might be able to take a stab at Beauchemin??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that DW still has tricks up his sleeve&#8230; I kinda think everything is coming down to Gustavsson making his choice. I think is he comes here they MIGHT consider trading Nabby&#8230;</p>
<p>But I agree that Heatly is NOT COMING TO SJ&#8230;I don&#8217;t think DW wants him, kinda seems like what we already have, all skill not much grit.</p>
<p>I still think Hartnell would be a great addition.</p>
<p>Any chances we might be able to take a stab at Beauchemin??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Plank</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/#comment-4326</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Plank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=381#comment-4326</guid>
		<description>Oh, and nice podcast yesterday guys. Any potential new names grier? I&#039;m thinking &quot;cantstoptheearlyexit&quot; hardy har har.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and nice podcast yesterday guys. Any potential new names grier? I&#8217;m thinking &#8220;cantstoptheearlyexit&#8221; hardy har har.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Plank</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/#comment-4325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Plank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=381#comment-4325</guid>
		<description>Ivan- I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s even possible for Grier, Moen, and Lemieux to be the only ones affected. We&#039;re currently sitting at 5.3 M in cap space, and need to sign/call up six forwards (with one of those being a healthy scratch) as well as a backup goaltender.

This is without Clowe signed, mind you. Pollak reported at InsideBayArea.com that they had come to terms- is it safe to assume he&#039;s somewhere in the 3 M per range? Regardless, that&#039;s a pretty tight salary fit even if Clowe wasn&#039;t in the picture.

I&#039;m kind of scared to see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ivan- I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s even possible for Grier, Moen, and Lemieux to be the only ones affected. We&#8217;re currently sitting at 5.3 M in cap space, and need to sign/call up six forwards (with one of those being a healthy scratch) as well as a backup goaltender.</p>
<p>This is without Clowe signed, mind you. Pollak reported at InsideBayArea.com that they had come to terms- is it safe to assume he&#8217;s somewhere in the 3 M per range? Regardless, that&#8217;s a pretty tight salary fit even if Clowe wasn&#8217;t in the picture.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m kind of scared to see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan M</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/#comment-4324</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=381#comment-4324</guid>
		<description>Ottawa just paid $4M bonus to Heatley and the word is that because of that, he&#039;s price has gone up, which is understandable.

With Chicago signing of Hossa, I think we may do a move to respond to this. But what do we know. None of us saw Boyle&#039;s signing, or Thornton or Blake.

DW can&#039;t talk about major changes and Grier, Moen and Lemiuex being the only ones affected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ottawa just paid $4M bonus to Heatley and the word is that because of that, he&#8217;s price has gone up, which is understandable.</p>
<p>With Chicago signing of Hossa, I think we may do a move to respond to this. But what do we know. None of us saw Boyle&#8217;s signing, or Thornton or Blake.</p>
<p>DW can&#8217;t talk about major changes and Grier, Moen and Lemiuex being the only ones affected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cantstopthegrier</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/#comment-4323</link>
		<dc:creator>cantstopthegrier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=381#comment-4323</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t imagine the Sharks giving up three players and a 1st round pick for Heatley.  Ottawa is totally bent over a barrel here and IF the Sharks are interested, then the price just went waaay down.  Given all the bad press and Heatley&#039;s tag of being a problem child, I don&#039;t see him coming to San Jose as part of a makeover - and especially not at that price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t imagine the Sharks giving up three players and a 1st round pick for Heatley.  Ottawa is totally bent over a barrel here and IF the Sharks are interested, then the price just went waaay down.  Given all the bad press and Heatley&#8217;s tag of being a problem child, I don&#8217;t see him coming to San Jose as part of a makeover &#8211; and especially not at that price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan M</title>
		<link>http://dudesonhockey.com/2009/07/01/july-1-kent-huskins-day/#comment-4322</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharks.hockeyanalysis.com/?p=381#comment-4322</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still thinking we may see a trade for Heatley. Not sure if you saw, but both Dreger and McKenzie reported yesterday on TSN (first on Twitter than in an article) that Heatley didn&#039;t make his mind up yesterday about Oilers because he was under the impression on the draft day that it was either NYR or the Sharks that he&#039;ll go to, and baam - Sens accept Oilers offer.

Michalek + Cheechoo + Prospect *not Petrecki* + 1st round pick in 2010 for Heatley - I&#039;d take it either as Sharks or Sens GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still thinking we may see a trade for Heatley. Not sure if you saw, but both Dreger and McKenzie reported yesterday on TSN (first on Twitter than in an article) that Heatley didn&#8217;t make his mind up yesterday about Oilers because he was under the impression on the draft day that it was either NYR or the Sharks that he&#8217;ll go to, and baam &#8211; Sens accept Oilers offer.</p>
<p>Michalek + Cheechoo + Prospect *not Petrecki* + 1st round pick in 2010 for Heatley &#8211; I&#8217;d take it either as Sharks or Sens GM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

