And stop caring about the Sharks so much… nah. While this time of year may be psychologically damaging in terms of the highs and lows, I wouldn’t trade it for anything. Luckily, I have just enough perspective (barely) to see that this is one helluva series so far. If I weren’t a Sharks fan, I’d want it to go seven for sure. As a Sharks fan, I don’t know if I could take it.

After a meltdown for the ages (or, as the Calgary papers put it, the Flames had a comeback for the ages) in game three, the Sharks post a comeback for the ages (or, as the Calgary papers put it, the Flames did a meltdown). And now, when I had the Sharks all but buried, they show some chutzpah. Although the game might not have been as dominating as the 22 shot differential indicates, the Sharks did control play. As much as I hate the cliche, “your best players have to be your best players”, Calgary have given themselves the best chance to win by living exactly that. Kipper is amazing, Iginla is dangerous every shift, and between big hits, every Phaneuf shot seems to have eyes for the net. It was the Sharks’ best players that came out in the last five minutes of the game, and that made the difference.

What can you say about game 5? Don’t miss it. Without question, the Sharks need to make quicker decisions in their own zone to neutralize the gutsy forecheck. I know this isn’t the Sharks’ system, but I’d want to see a winger out in the neutral zone for a stretch pass- hopefully that would keep the D from jumping up to the red line, or sometimes, even the blue line.

To anyone who said that Joe Thornton isn’t a big game player….it’s time to eat some humble pie. #1 Star and perhaps…just perhaps…the biggest goal in Sharks franchise history when you think of the consequences if the Sharks lost this game.

I’ve calmed down now…a little

Last night at my house, I was a disaster as I watched the Sharks slowly crumble under the physical nature and playoff pressure of Game 3 in Calgary. All the questions that have been raised are all valid and, as we all know, none of them are new issues. San Jose Mercury News columnist Mark Purdy says it all in his article in today’s paper hitting all the relevant concerns.

1) Why do the Sharks always take the foot off the gas when they get a big lead? This pattern repeats and repeats and I have to point the finger at Ron Wilson on this one. While the players play the game, how do you stand by and watch your boys sit back and chase the opposition around – hoping that Nabby can hang on to the victory. This doesn’t work. It hasn’t worked. It will never work. I wanted the Sharks to try and win last night 7-1 and instead, after Kipper got chased, they stopped pressing and gave Calgary the glimmer of hope they needed to come back.

2) Patrick Marleau showed some balls last night, I’ll give him that – but the rest of the Sharks were completely nutless. Shame on them for allowing their Captain to get bloodied twice without exacting any kind of revenge on one of Calgary’s top players. Where was Jody Shelley? He was only given four minutes of ice time… Where was Dougie Murray? Where was Craig Rivet even? Someone should have done something to send the message that this type of tactic will not fly with the 2007-08 Sharks. Instead – they proved physical play is their kryptonite once again. The Sharks can be bullied without any fear of response.

3) People have been saying Joe isn’t a big time playoff performer, but I have to disagree. Last year Joe had 11 points in as many playoff games and the year before he had nine in eleven. Calgary has put all their focus on shutting down the Thornton line because it worked so well for them during the regular season. As for Brian Campbell, his weaknesses have been exposed in this series. He is allergic to physical play and has been a non-factor, making noticeable errors in his own zone. His +1 with one assist doesn’t really tell the tale of his series so far.

Tomorrow night is not only a pivotal game in the series, but a landmark game for this franchise. If the Sharks go down again, this will be a different team next year with a different coach behind the bench. The roster turnover could be high, with some surprising names leaving town. Campbell might not be resigned and other veterans will likely be cut loose as well. But if, somehow, the Sharks can shake their playoff demons and gut out a Game 4 victory – they can put this all behind them.

I’m nervous as hell. Are you?

This must be backwards day, because I actually agree with Garner.  If this were a team that fought hard to the very end the last couple of years in the playoffs, only to come up a bit short, I wouldn’t be so fatalistic about the Sharks’ chances.  But the fact is, they folded like a cheap suit last year, and the year before that.  Now that they turtled up like a high school wrestler in a UFC fight, I have to think the outcome will be the same.

Technically, there are more games to play, and technically, it’s not over.  But for all intents and purposes, I think the season has about 20 minutes left.  The first period of game 4.  If the Sharks don’t show something different in the next 20 minutes of hockey, the playoffs are over for them.  Calgary did exactly what they needed to do when they fell behind 3-0: they started running people, and dished out as many borderline hits as they could muster.  Keenan’s bitching after Game 2 did its job- the refs looked the other way while the Flames created some momentum out of thin air.

Now it’s the Sharks’ turn.  They have to create something out of thin air.  Or else the postseason will go up in a puff of smoke and barely a whimper.

So the Sharks tied up the series with a 2-0 win Thursday at the Tank, and boy, was it rocking. There were plenty of things to cheer about. Obviously, the lead story is all about Nabby and his outright robberies of Iginla and Nolan. Let’s not forget Kipper made 41 saves against the Sharks. It’s not as if Nabby stole the game away, and it should have been much closer. I think the Sharks had two or three breakaways that were turned aside by Kipper. If one of those goes in along with another one of the seemingly myriad quality chances, it would have been a blowout.

That’s not to say Nabby’s saves weren’t especially timely. The one in the first would have given Calgary an early lead, and the later one might have changed some momentum in Calgary’s favor. Still, the Sharks mostly controlled play, and the Flames were forced to take a truckload of penalties, which I thought were all reasonable calls.

I have to say I think the Sharks have muscled their way into the driver’s seat, if only for now. They outshot the Flames in both games, won the last in a shutout, and are the best team in the NHL on the road.

I’m glad to see Matt Carle played well last night. The key to the Flames’ success in game 1 seemed to be rushing the D on the breakout, with Frankenstein in there making mistakes again and again with that first pass. Carle’s decisiveness and speed seemed to crack the puzzle in game 2. If Ehrhoff can come back soon, it will only help that cause further.

I have to say I’m amazed at how many Sharks fans seemed surprised at the effort the Calgary Flames turned in during Game 1. How could you have expected any different from Mike Keenan’s boys? They are not afraid of our San Jose Sharks, the “hottest team in the NHL”, they even have what you might consider to be ownage on the Sharks this season. I’ve talked to a few people today who are already ready to write off the season. To that I say – good, don’t watch – we don’t need fair weather fans. The Sharks are not done, I have to believe that this team is better than years past and they are going to rally and find a way to get past Calgary to even up the series 1-1 tonight.

Here are two interesting stats from last night, one surprising and one not. If you watched the game, would you call me a liar if I told you the Sharks outhit the Flames 41-36? It sure didn’t look that way – I think Mike and I would have guessed the Flames outhit us by double digits last night. Nolan and Phaneuf flew around and really laid the body on us. The only noticeable Shark throwing his weight around regularly was Clowe, he led the game with seven hits. The other stat, and perhaps most alarming, was the 19 giveaways the Sharks had – and most of them in their own zone. Brian Campbell has four of the giveaways and, for the first time in Teal, he did not have a good game. The physical nature of the game really took Brian out of his element.

It sounds like Seto and Carle will be in the lineup tonight – so thank god Frankenstein will likely be on the pine, but who will sit amongst the forwards? My guess is Ron Wilson is already pulling the plug on Jody Shelley in the playoffs, after only playing him four minutes last night. I also have an issue with the refs last night, who treated Calgary like the #2 seed and gave Iginla and Phaneuf superstar treatment. It’s our building, the Sharks are the elite team – and they don’t get that respect from the refs at all. I’m not saying Calgary played a dirty game, they didn’t – but two of the calls last night were dressed up by Calgary players and the refs took the bait. So, doesn’t that mean when Saurich even thinks about touching Thornton behind the net, it should be interference? I hope things even out tonight.

Am I a sucker? Should I be jumping off the sinking Sharks ship with the others? Is this going to be just like last year, and the year before? I still believe in my heart that this is the Sharks year and tonight we will see which team is going to show – the team that middled around for 2/3 of the season in 6th place or the best team in the NHL since the trade-deadline. Tonight the Sharks will jump on Calgary early.

San Jose 4 Calgary 2

The Sharks have lost ten of the 22 games Alexei “Frankenstein” Semenov has played this year. That is almost half. That sucks for a team that experts around the country are picking to make a long anticipated run for Lord Stanley’s Cup. Why does this matter? Because, all indications are that Christian Ehrhoff is not healthy enough to play tonight in Game 1 against the Calgary Flames, so Ron Wilson has turned to Frankenstein to pick up the slack. Frankenstein. A brain-eating defensemen who contributes nothing to the club but a disasterous plus/minus stat of -8, which stinks for a guy who played only a quarter of the games this year. Actually, Semenov only had three games this year when he was on the plus side of the number.

What does this say about Matt Carle? Well, it says that Ron Wilson trusts him about as much as a week-old Breakfast Hot Pocket. FLUSH POCKET! He has only seen the ice five times since March 1st. And Ozo’s -3 performance against Dallas in the finale cemented his role as practice dummy. I guess, when you look around, the options are pretty slim. Should the Sharks have hung on to Rob Davison instead of peddling him off for a 7th round pick? We’re about to find out.

East

Montreal vs. Boston: I think the Habs are the Sharks a year ago- a bitchin’ power play, but defense that can take a night or two off. If they run up against a good penalty killing team, they could be in trouble. That being said, Boston has the second-worst PK in the East. Montreal in five.

Pittsburg vs. Ottawa: You have goalie problems, you’ve got playoff problems. And Ottawa has goalie problems. With Malkin and Crosby ready and waiting, it’s all on Gerber. Pittsburg in six.

Washington vs. Philadelphia: Keep in mind that Philly has more points than the Caps, even though the Caps are a #3 seed. I think the Caps have been so focused on trying to make the postseason, they may not be as ready as other teams. Either way, it’ll be great to watch. Philly in seven.

New York Rangers vs. New Jersey: I was on the Rangers’ bandwagon before the season started, and now I’m way off. With Jagr tailing off, and the Gomez/Drury bust, I’d rather put my money on possibly the greatest goaltender of all time. New Jersey in six.

West

Detroit vs. Nashville: The Preds are gonna get streamrolled, plain and simple. Nashville is outmanned in every possible aspect of the game. Detroit in four.

San Jose vs. Calgary: Worst possible draw for the Sharks. This series is going to be long and brutal. This is a Sharks blog, so I’m almost contractually obligated to pick them, but this could be an upset. San Jose in seven.

Minnesota vs. Colorado: Toughest series for me to predict. The Wild are on my s&*! list for laying down on the last day of the season and giving us Calgary instead of the Avs. When they play well it’s stifling, but they are in the middle of the pack for goals against. They won the season series against Colorado, but are now playing against possibly the best defensive defenseman this year. Colorado in seven.

Anaheim vs. Dallas: With Pronger back and Zubov out, I can’t imagine this being a long series. The Stars wanted to dust off their knuckles against the Sharks to be ready to dodge the Pronger Stompin’™, but it won’t be nearly enough. Anaheim in five.

The update: there is no update.  For some reason, this contest has seemingly taken Eklund completely by surprise, even though he organized it and is running it.  The first post was submitted almost three weeks ago, and they’ve only posted 6 matchups out of 32 so far.   The post grier submitted is now horribly and ridiculously out of date- it was a updated punchier version of “Who Do You Want?”  Now that the matchups are set, reading that post will be about as interesting as watching grass grow.  Which is to say more interesting than reading some of the contest posts so far.   We’re going to try and submit a more timely post this week, but we have no idea if it will be accepted.  It almost looks like the pace is slowing down even further- they said they would post three contests per day, and they ended up doing 4 all week.  I wouldn’t be surprised if the whole thing collapses under its own weight.  My recommendation to Eklund is to just shut the whole thing down, and re-open once you have a clue what you’re doing.